In The Procter and Gamble Company v. IPI India Private Limited (O.P.(TM) Nos. 48, 49 and 50 of 2024), the Madras High Court dismissed trademark rectification petitions filed by P&G, holding that the term “Vapo” is descriptive, common to the trade, and publici juris, and therefore incapable of exclusive appropriation. The Court found that “Vapo”, […]
