Home » Alerts » IBC Update: Supreme Court clarifies treatment of PUFE recoveries in resolution plans

DISCLAIMER: The material contained in this publication is solely for information and general guidance and not for advertising or soliciting. The information provided does not constitute professional advice that may be required before acting on any matter. While every care has been taken in the preparation of this publication to ensure its accuracy, Vaish Associates Advocates neither assumes responsibility for any errors, which despite all precautions, may be found herein nor accepts any liability, and disclaims all responsibility, for any kind of loss or damage arising on account of anyone acting / refraining to act by placing reliance upon the information contained in this publication.

In a recent judgment in Piramal Capital and Housing Finance Limited vs. 63 Moons Technologies Ltd & Others, the Supreme Court has clarified key aspects relating to PUFE (Preferential, Undervalued, Fraudulent, Extortionate) transactions under the IBC. The Court upheld the Resolution Plan approved by the NCLT, affirming that the distribution of recoveries from proceedings under Section 66 (Fraudulent/Wrongful Trading) falls within the commercial domain of the CoC and the resolution applicant.

Our latest Solve-ency update decodes this critical ruling and its implications for future resolution plans.

We hope you like our publication. We look forward to your suggestions.

Please feel free to contact us at [email protected]

 

DOWNLOAD PDF FILE