TaxBuzz | Delhi High Court quashes reassessment notices issued post Abhisar Buildwell; holds Revenue cannot coax life into notices otherwise barred by limitation

We are pleased to share with you a copy of our in-house publication – “TaxBuzz”, wherein we have analysed the recent ruling of the Delhi High Court in a batch of matters led by Dharampal Satyapal Ltd. (as successor of Abhisar Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. The High Court, in the said ruling, has quashed reassessment proceedings initiated by the Revenue pursuant to the apex Court judgment in the case of Abhisar Buildwell [2023] 454 ITR 212 (SC) relying on Instruction No.1 of 2023 (dated 23.08.2023). The Court has elaborately dealt with provisions of section 150 and held that reassessments were barred by limitation u/s 149 observing that “the limited right that was made available to the Revenue by Hon’ble Supreme Court to initiate reassessment proceedings cannot be construed as a carte-blanche enabling the Respondents to overcome and override the restrictions that otherwise appear in Section 149 of the Act.”

Ruling of the Delhi High Court is the first dealing with invalidity to the reassessment proceedings initiated by the Revenue in multiple cases merely relying on observation of the apex Court in Abhisar Buildwell (supra) where search assessments stood quashed in absence of incriminating material.

The matter was successfully represented by Mr. Ajay Vohra, Sr. Advocate, Mr. ROHIT JAIN, Mr. Aniket D. Agrawal, Mr. Deepesh Jain, and Mr. Samarth Chaudhari, Advocates.

We trust that you will find our TaxBuzz useful and look forward to receiving your valuable feedback.

For any further information/ clarification, please feel free to write to:

Mr. Rohit Jain,
Senior Partner
[email protected]

Mr. Aniket D. Agrawal
Associate Partner
[email protected]

Mr. Deepesh Jain
Associate Partner
[email protected]

Mr. Samarth Chaudhari
Senior Associate
[email protected]

TaxBuzz | Delhi High Court Settles the Buzz on Validity of Proceedings Against a Non-Existent Entity

We are pleased to share with you a copy of our in-house publication – “TaxBuzz”, wherein we have analysed the recent ruling of the Delhi High Court in a batch of matters led by Religare Securities Ltd. The High Court in the said ruling, has delved into aspects relating to validity of the assessment/ reassessment undertaken under the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’) on an entity not in existence or dissolved under the provisions of law. In the ultimate conclusion, the Court has held that proceedings instituted and/ or completed in the name of a non-existent entity is nullity and void in the eyes of law.

The said ruling is likely to impact those assessee wherein the assessment/ re-assessment proceedings were initiated and/ or completed in the name of amalgamating entity, and thus, requires the attention of such assessees.

We trust that you will find our TaxBuzz useful and look forward to receiving your valuable feedback.

For any further information/ clarification, please feel free to write to:

Mr. Rohit Jain,
Senior Partner
[email protected]

Mr. Aniket D. Agrawal
Associate Partner
[email protected]

TaxBuzz | Eligibility of US based LLC to avail benefits under the India-USA DTAA

We are pleased to share with you a copy of our in-house publication – “TaxBuzz”.

In this edition, we have analyzed the recent decision of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal in the case of General Motors Company USA, affirming the eligibility of US based Limited Liability Companies to avail benefits under the India-USA Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement.

We trust that you will find our TaxBuzz useful and look forward to receiving your valuable feedback.

For any clarifications, please write to:

Mr. Aditya Vohra
Associate Partner
[email protected]

Mr. Arpit Goyal
Senior Associate
[email protected]

Customs and GST Alert – Vol. 1 – Issue 9 – September 2024

We are pleased to share our bi-monthly newsletter on the latest GST and Customs Developments. The newsletter covers recent judgments and regulatory updates in the GST and Customs space in India.

We trust that you will find the same useful.

Looking forward to receiving your valuable feedback.

For any clarification, please write to:

Mr. Shammi Kapoor
Senior Partner
[email protected]

Mr. Arnab Roy
Associate Partner
[email protected]

India revamps its Merger Control Regime – Introduces Deal Value Threshold in new Combination Regulations!

We are pleased to share with you a copy of our in-house publication – “Competition News Alert”.

On September 9, 2024, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs notified the remaining provisions of the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2023 along with related Rules and the Competition Commission of India (CCI) notified the revised Combination Regulations governing the regulation of mergers and acquisitions.

The new provisions of the Act, the new Rules, and the new Competition Commission of India (Combinations) Regulations, 2024, have come into force with w.e.f. September 10, 2024.

Key updates include the introduction of (a) Deal Value Thresholds (DVT) for transactions exceeding INR 2000 crore, and (b) formal establishment of a “Green Channel” for expedited merger approvals. The timeline for approvals has also been reduced to streamline the process.

We have discussed the key amendments in detail.

We trust that you will find our Competition News Alert useful and look forward to receiving your valuable feedback.

For any clarifications, please write to:

Mr. MM Sharma
Head – Competition Law Practice
[email protected]

SEBI Modifies Valuation Framework of Investment Portfolio of AIFs

Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”), vide its circular dated September 19, 2024 (“AIF Amendment Circular”) has introduced amendments to the Master Circular for Alternative Investment Funds (“AIF(s)”) dated May 7, 2024 (“AIF Master Circular”) regarding the valuation framework of investment portfolio of AIFs.

The key amendments include:

(a) Valuation norms for securities – Subsequent to the AIF Amendment Circular, the revised valuation framework for AIFs is as under:

  • Valuation of securities for which valuation norms have been prescribed under the SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1996 (“MF Regulations”) – In case of such securities, which are mostly listed securities, the valuation shall be carried out as per the norms prescribed under the MF Regulations.
  • Valuation of unlisted securities, thinly traded and non-traded securities – Valuation of securities which are not covered in the MF Regulations, which are mostly unlisted securities, thinly traded and non-traded securities, shall be carried out as per the International Private Equity and Venture Capital Valuation Guidelines (IPEV Guidelines). It is envisaged that the valuation norms for such securities shall be harmonized across entities within SEBI’s regulatory purview by March 31, 2025.

(b) Change in valuation methodology and approach – no longer a ‘material change’ – Pursuant to the AIF Amendment Circular, change in valuation methodology/approach shall not be construed as ‘material change’. Prior to the amendment, any change in the valuation methodology was construed as material change significantly influencing the decision of the investor to continue to be invested in the scheme of the AIF. Accordingly, such AIFs were required to provide an exit option to existing investors who did not wish to continue post the valuation methodology change.

The AIF Amendment Circular further mandates that subsequent to any valuation methodology change, the valuation of the investment carried out based on valuation methodologies/ approaches, both old and new, shall be disclosed to the investors to ensure transparency.

(c) Eligibility criteria for independent valuer – Investment manager of an AIF is required to ensure that the AIF appoints an independent valuer, which satisfies the criteria specified by SEBI in the AIF Master Circular, for valuing investment portfolio of AIFs. The AIF industry had sought a clarification whether valuers who are set up as an entity are required to be Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (“IBBI”) registered valuer entity and at the same time, whether all of its members are required to have a membership. SEBI has provided a clarification by introducing the following eligibility criteria for independent valuer for a partnership entity or company:

  • Such entity or company shall be a ‘Registered Valuer Entity’ registered with IBBI; and
  • The deputed/authorized person(s) of such ‘Registered Valuer Entity’, who undertake(s) the valuation of investment portfolio of AIFs, shall have a membership of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India or the Institute of Company Secretaries of India or the Institute of Cost Accountants of India or a Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) Charter from the CFA Institute.

(d) Timelines for reporting of valuation of investments of AIF to performance benchmarking agencies – AIFs have now been provided 7 months (erstwhile 6 months) to report valuations based on audited data from investee companies to the performance benchmarking agencies, by October 31st of each year.

To read the AIF Amendment Circular click here

For any clarification, please write to:

Mr. Yatin Narang
Partner
[email protected]