NCLAT: No default by real estate developer if possession delayed due to reasons beyond control

An application had been filed by home buyers, Shilpa Jain and Akash Jain (collectively, “Respondents”) under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (“CIRP”) against Raheja Developers (“Corporate Debtor”). The National Company Law Tribunal, Special Bench at New Delhi (“NCLT”) by order dated August 20, 2020 (“Impugned […]

SC: No provision under the IBC requiring the resolution plan to match liquidation value; and an approved resolution plan cannot be withdrawn under Section 12A of the IBC

The Supreme Court (“SC”) has by its judgement (decided on January 22, 2020) held that there is no provision in the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IBC”) that requires a resolution plan to match the liquidation value of the assets of the corporate debtor and that an approved resolution plan cannot be withdrawn by a […]

NCLT: RP can take possession of a corporate debtor’s assets which are subject matter of litigation to facilitate the corporate insolvency resolution process

The National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench (“NCLT”) in the case of Pravin Blaggan, in the matter of Goa Auto Accessories v. Suresh Saluja (decided on December 12, 2019) held that a resolution professional (“RP”) could take possession of a corporate debtor’s assets which were subject matter of litigation, to facilitate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution […]

Supreme Court: Difference between inadequacy of reasons in arbitral award and unintelligible awards

The Supreme Court of India (“SC”) has vide its judgment dated December18, 2019 (“Judgment”), highlighted the difference between inadequacy of reasons in an arbitral award and unintelligible arbitral awards passed under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“Act”). FACTS DCM Shriram Aqua Foods Limited (“DCM”) had entered into a contract (“Contract”) with M/s. Crompton Greaves […]