Home » Alerts » Punjab & Haryana High Court Lays Down Guidelines for Denial of ITC

DISCLAIMER: The material contained in this publication is solely for information and general guidance and not for advertising or soliciting. The information provided does not constitute professional advice that may be required before acting on any matter. While every care has been taken in the preparation of this publication to ensure its accuracy, Vaish Associates Advocates neither assumes responsibility for any errors, which despite all precautions, may be found herein nor accepts any liability, and disclaims all responsibility, for any kind of loss or damage arising on account of anyone acting / refraining to act by placing reliance upon the information contained in this publication.

In a batch of 424 writ petitions, the Punjab and Haryana High Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST Act, 2017, while holding that Input Tax Credit (“ITC”) cannot be denied to a purchasing dealer mechanically merely because the supplier has failed to deposit tax with the Government or its GST registration has been cancelled retrospectively.

The Court emphasised that the Department must undertake a fact-specific inquiry, establish a direct link between the purchasing dealer and the alleged default or fraudulent conduct, and disclose the material relied upon in the show cause notice. It also laid down detailed guidelines governing ITC denial, invocation of Section 74, retrospective cancellation of registration and prevention of double recovery.

The judgment provides significant relief to genuine purchasing dealers and reinforces procedural safeguards in GST proceedings, while retaining the burden on taxpayers to establish ITC eligibility through appropriate documentary evidence.

For any clarification, please write to [email protected]

DOWNLOAD PDF FILE